Expectancy in plain English: how a losing week can still be a winning system
You don't need to win often. You need your winners bigger than your losers by enough. The simple ma…
India's retail derivatives traders lose money more than nine times out of ten. SEBI's own study puts it at 93% over FY22–FY24, with individuals losing ₹1.8 lakh crore in three years. The instinctive explanation is that most people just aren't smart enough. That's wrong — and believing it is part of the trap.
The losing majority are engineers, doctors, business owners, analysts. Intelligent people. What they share isn't a low IQ; it's a method: they trade on prediction and emotion. A tip, a hunch, a news reaction, a position sized by how confident they feel that morning. No tested process underneath.
That method has a stable, provable outcome — which is exactly why the loss rate never moves. When participation nearly doubled (5.1M to 9.6M traders in two years), the share losing money held near 90%. Adding people to the losing side doesn't change the side. The percentage is a property of the approach, not the people.
A smart person using a losing method loses faster — because they're better at inventing reasons for the next bad trade. Intelligence without structure becomes rationalisation.
The minority doesn't predict. They describe what the market is actually doing, decide by rules they've tested, and know their downside before they risk a rupee. It's not more intelligence. It's a different operating system — process over prediction, evidence over opinion.